top of page

Overview of Course Organization and Structure, 2022 - Semester 2

Executive Summary:
Feedback from the second semester of 2022 paints a generally favorable picture regarding course organization and structure. There's evidence that systematic changes have led to better curriculum flow and coherence. However, while many courses seem well-structured, there are still areas where clarity and consistency could be enhanced, optimizing the academic journey for every student.

The following graph shows the evolution of the perception of course organization and structure, with a score over 0 meaning a majority of positive comments in the feedback data:

Positive Developments:

Seamless Online Platforms: Students applauded the streamlined online platforms, which have made accessing course materials, assignments, and feedback more intuitive and user-friendly.

Clarified Syllabi: There's been positive feedback about the clarity and comprehensiveness of course syllabi, with many instructors outlining weekly objectives, readings, and deliverables effectively.

Interdisciplinary Integration: Courses that have incorporated elements from various disciplines have been well-received, giving students a holistic understanding of the subject matter.

Regular Course Reviews: The introduction of regular course reviews has meant that courses are updated more frequently to remain relevant and aligned with industry or academic changes.

Areas of Concern:

Overlapping Content: Some students pointed out redundancy or overlap in content between courses or within different sections of the same course.

Varied Assessment Standards: While some courses had clear and consistent assessment criteria, others seemed ambiguous or inconsistent, leading to student uncertainty.

Gaps in Sequential Learning: There were instances where the logical progression of topics seemed disrupted, causing confusion or the need for students to seek external resources.

Lack of Flexibility: A segment of feedback indicated that some courses, particularly electives, didn't offer enough flexibility in choosing topics or projects aligned with individual interests.


Establish a course audit committee that routinely checks for overlapping content, ensuring each course remains distinct and value-driven.

Create a standardized assessment guideline that can be adapted by all courses, ensuring clear and consistent grading criteria.

Engage in periodic curriculum mapping to ensure logical and sequential flow of topics within courses.

Consider introducing modular courses or more open-ended projects, especially in elective courses, allowing students to tailor their learning to specific interests.

In conclusion, it's evident that strides have been made to improve course organization and structure. By addressing the highlighted concerns, we can ensure that our academic offerings are both rigorous and flexible, catering to the diverse needs of our student population.

bottom of page