top of page

Overview of Quality of Teaching and Instruction, 2022 - Semester 2

Executive Summary:
The feedback from semester 2 of 2022 shows a positive shift in the perception of the quality of teaching and instruction on campus. While faculty members and the teaching methodologies have shown appreciable advancements, some areas still demand further attention. Addressing these matters will ensure a more effective and enriched learning experience for all students.

The following graph shows the evolution of the perceived availability and usefulness of academic ressources, with a score over 0 meaning a majority of positive comments in the feedback data:

Positive Developments:

Adoption of Modern Teaching Tools: Feedback indicates a widespread appreciation for the inclusion of modern teaching aids like interactive software and digital simulations, enhancing the learning experience for many.

Increased Faculty Training: Several respondents commended the increase in faculty training sessions, which have led to more engaging lectures and discussions.

Interactive Classroom Sessions: There's been a noted rise in professors encouraging classroom interactions and discussions, making sessions more engaging and less monotonous for students.

Feedback-driven Changes: Many students have seen their earlier feedback being acted upon, which manifests as improved teaching techniques and better syllabus coverage over the semester.

Areas of Concern:

Inconsistent Grading Practices: A few students expressed concerns over discrepancies in grading, feeling that certain courses or instructors might not maintain consistent evaluation standards.

Pacing Issues: Some feedback pointed to courses either moving too quickly or too slowly, causing either a rushed feeling or a sense of stagnation, respectively.

Limited Office Hours: While many faculty members have been accessible, there were mentions of some instructors having limited availability outside of class, hindering personalized academic support.

Use of Outdated Materials: Despite the overall modern approach, there were instances where students felt that some courses still relied heavily on outdated materials or textbooks.

Recommendations:

Establish a centralized and transparent grading guideline to ensure consistency across all courses and instructors.

Solicit feedback mid-semester regarding pacing, allowing instructors the opportunity to adjust in real-time based on student needs.

Encourage all faculty members to maintain regular and flexible office hours, ensuring they are accessible to students outside of classroom settings.

Periodically review and update course materials, ensuring the most current and relevant resources are being used for instruction.

In conclusion, while there have been significant improvements in teaching quality, there are key aspects that require refinement. By continuously acting on student feedback, we can foster an environment where teaching excellence remains at the forefront of our educational mission.

bottom of page